1,023 notes
03:06 PM . 19 February 2012

The ‘biblical view’ that’s younger than the Happy Meal

In 1979, McDonald’s introduced the Happy Meal.

Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception.

Ask any American evangelical, today, what the Bible says about abortion and they will insist that this is what it says. (Many don’t actually believe this, but they know it is the only answer that won’t get them in trouble.) They’ll be a little fuzzy on where, exactly, the Bible says this, but they’ll insist that it does.

That’s new. If you had asked American evangelicals that same question the year I was born you would not have gotten the same answer.

That year, Christianity Today — edited by Harold Lindsell, champion of “inerrancy” and author of The Battle for the Bible — published a special issue devoted to the topics of contraception and abortion. That issue included many articles that today would get their authors, editors — probably even their readers — fired from almost any evangelical institution. For example, one article by a professor from Dallas Theological Seminary criticized the Roman Catholic position on abortion as unbiblical. Jonathan Dudley quotes from the article in his book Broken Words: The Abuse of Science and Faith in American Politics. Keep in mind that this is from a conservative evangelical seminary professor, writing in Billy Graham’s magazine for editor Harold Lindsell:

God does not regard the fetus as a soul, no matter how far gestation has progressed. The Law plainly exacts: “If a man kills any human life he will be put to death” (Lev. 24:17). But according to Exodus 21:22-24, the destruction of the fetus is not a capital offense. … Clearly, then, in contrast to the mother, the fetus is not reckoned as a soul.

Christianity Today would not publish that article in 2012. They might not even let you write that in comments on their website. If you applied for a job in 2012 with Christianity Today or Dallas Theological Seminary and they found out that you had written something like that, ever, you would not be hired.

At some point between 1968 and 2012, the Bible began to say something different. That’s interesting.

(Source: kohenari)

  1. gringogaffe reblogged this from bemusedlybespectacled
  2. herstarlight reblogged this from starkosis
  3. ladydontfallbackwards reblogged this from beadsflowers
  4. starkosis reblogged this from beadsflowers
  5. beadsflowers reblogged this from skylines-
  6. wisdomfromthelies reblogged this from kohenari
  7. dedreo reblogged this from kohenari
  8. soulmusic90 reblogged this from accidentalsongs
  9. butwewereokay reblogged this from bemusedlybespectacled
  10. newyorkaddicts reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  11. iturnedintoatree reblogged this from rabbleprochoice
  12. 4dbutterfly reblogged this from thevoxbox
  13. blackxmod reblogged this from jessthemesslol
  14. jessthemesslol reblogged this from a-curious-creature
  15. a-curious-creature reblogged this from kohenari
  16. clockworkesper reblogged this from paxamericana
  17. mlle-annetoinette reblogged this from fleurdelanuit
  18. shuvva reblogged this from lesshumansmorecats
  19. thatssoquack reblogged this from bubbybobble
  20. nerdyinsomniac reblogged this from bubbybobble
  21. yourtumblriscrap reblogged this from lesshumansmorecats
  22. beartzu reblogged this from conjuringseed
  23. take-this-t0-y0ur-grave reblogged this from lesshumansmorecats
  24. vilegoblindaughter reblogged this from lesshumansmorecats
  25. bubbybobble reblogged this from lesshumansmorecats
  26. fleurdelanuit reblogged this from lesshumansmorecats
  27. lesshumansmorecats reblogged this from keenquing
  28. tyranny-saurus reblogged this from stfueverything
  29. thecatsm3ow reblogged this from princesslog
  30. aflammableheart reblogged this from seriouslyamerica
  31. urmonotheismus reblogged this from this-is-somestuff
  32. mental-agony reblogged this from conjuringseed